By Sindy Dunbar
Desk of Contents
Chapter 1 - Accuracy Paradox & Apportionment Paradox
Chapter 2 - All Horses are an analogous colour & endless Regress
Chapter three - Drinker Paradox & Lottery Paradox
Chapter four - Paradoxes of fabric Implication
Chapter five - Raven Paradox
Chapter 6 - unforeseen placing Paradox
Chapter 7 - Banach–Tarski Paradox
Chapter eight - sea coast Paradox & Paradoxical Set
Chapter nine - Gabriel's Horn & lacking sq. Puzzle
Chapter 10 - Smale's Paradox & Hausdorff Paradox
Chapter eleven - Borel–Kolmogorov Paradox & Berkson's Paradox
Chapter 12 - child Paradox & Burali-Forti Paradox
Chapter thirteen - Elevator Paradox
Chapter 14 - Godel's Incompleteness Theorems
Chapter 15 - Gambler's Fallacy
Read or Download Logic & Mathematical Paradoxes PDF
Similar puzzles & games books
Arithmetic is greater than only a huge set of difficulties. probably greater than the other factor, it's approximately principles, frequently from a seed planted via a uncomplicated human actual want, yet normally, the unique germ seemed within the brain of a human. easy rules make the guidelines of arithmetic diversified from the abstractions in different components.
Fit wits with the good minds of the world’s maximum civilizations during this attention-grabbing number of historic conundrums, brainteasers, and mind-benders. • What do prehistoric bone markings and smooth laptop technology have in universal? • What is the secret of pi that stumped generations of old mathematicians?
- Colors & Markings of the McDonnell Douglas F-4D Phantom II - C & M Vol. 4
- Learn & Play Sudoku
- Temple of Elemental Evil (Advanced Dungeons & Dragons AD&D Supermodule T1-4)
- The Ultimate Casino Guide
Extra info for Logic & Mathematical Paradoxes
Overlaying the hypotenuses from both figures results in a very thin parallelogram with the area of exactly one grid square, the same area "missing" from the second figure. According to Martin Gardner, the puzzle was invented by a New York City amateur magician Paul Curry in 1953. The principle of a dissection paradox has however been known since the 1860s. The integer dimensions of the parts of the puzzle (2, 3, 5, 8, 13) are successive Fibonacci numbers. Many other geometric dissection puzzles are based on a few simple properties of the famous Fibonacci sequence.
Existential presuppositions A number of authors have argued that propositions of the form "All A are B" presuppose that there are objects which are A. This analysis has been applied to the raven paradox: ... H1: "All ravens are black" and H2: "All nonblack things are nonravens" are not strictly equivalent ... due to their different existential presuppositions. Moreover, although H1 and H2 describe the same regularity - the nonexistence of nonblack ravens - they have different logical forms. The two hypotheses have different senses and incorporate different procedures for testing the regularity they describe.
Using this terminology, the Banach–Tarski paradox can be reformulated as follows: A three-dimensional Euclidean ball is equidecomposable with two copies of itself. In fact, there is a sharp result in this case, due to Robinson: doubling the ball can be accomplished with five pieces, and fewer than five pieces will not suffice. The strong version of the paradox claims: Any two bounded subsets of 3-dimensional Euclidean space with non-empty interiors are equidecomposable. While apparently more general, this statement is derived in a simple way from the doubling of a ball by using a generalization of Bernstein–Schroeder theorem due to Banach that implies that if A is equidecomposable with a subset of B and B is equidecomposable with a subset of A, then A and B are equidecomposable.